LLM Cost Optimization Hub

Reduce cost, keep quality: unit economics + eval proof

This hub focuses on unit economics: token and context optimization, routing, caching, batching, pruning, cost monitoring. Optimize cost while keeping quality—with eval to prove it.

Common ROI & cost pains

LLM cost too high?
📈Inference cost rising; token bloat out of control
🐘Using model too large; when longer context reduces accuracy
✂️Reduce token usage without losing accuracy—how?
🔄Route to GPT-4 only when needed—but when?
Cost per ticket resolved: unclear ROI for execs
💰Cost drivers

Tokens, context, retries, tools

Know where cost comes from before optimizing. Inference cost optimization starts with attribution.

Input tokens

Prompt + system + context. Long context = high cost. RAG retrieval often over-fetches.

Impact: Dominant for RAG; scales with context length.

Output tokens

Generation length. Verbose outputs, retries, tool-call chains add up.

Impact: Variable by task; max_tokens and stop conditions matter.

Retries & failures

Failed requests still cost. Timeouts, rate limits, errors trigger retries.

Impact: Hidden cost; measure retry rate and cost per failed attempt.

Tool calls

Each tool invocation = extra round-trip. Multi-step reasoning multiplies cost.

Impact: Can 2–5x cost for agentic workflows.
✂️Token & context optimization

Reduce token usage without losing accuracy

Token optimization patterns. Prompt optimization measurable via eval. When longer context reduces accuracy—right-size it.

Context compression

Summarize, truncate, or chunk smarter. When longer context reduces accuracy—don't blindly add tokens. Right-size context per query.

Prompt optimization (measurable)

Shorter prompts, clearer instructions. A/B test with eval—prove quality holds. Prompt optimization measurable via eval suite.

Retrieval pruning

Reduce top-k, filter irrelevant chunks. Fewer tokens to model without losing recall (measure it).

Output constraints

Max tokens, structured output (JSON), stop sequences. Prevent runaway generation.

Model routing

Route to GPT-4 only when needed (with eval proof)

Model routing policies: small vs large. Prove quality holds with eval before rolling out.

1

Route to small model first

Use cheaper model for simple queries; escalate to GPT-4 only when needed. Classify by complexity, intent, or confidence.

2

Eval proof

Don't guess. Run eval suite before/after routing change. Prove quality holds or tradeoffs are acceptable.

3

Fallback policy

When to escalate: low confidence, specific intents, user tier. Document and version routing rules.

4

Cost per task

Measure cost per ticket resolved, cost per successful completion. Route to minimize cost per outcome, not per request.

📦Caching & batching

Economics: caching reduces cost

Response cache, prompt cache, batching. Throughput economics: better utilization, lower cost per token.

Response cache

Cache identical or near-identical queries. High hit rate on FAQ, repeated intents. Reduces inference cost directly.

Prompt/context cache

KV cache, prompt caching. Reuse encoded context across requests. Caching reduces cost for long-context workloads.

Batching

Batch requests where latency allows. Throughput economics: higher utilization, lower cost per token.

Throughput economics

Higher throughput = better GPU utilization = lower cost per request. Balance with latency SLOs.

📊Cost observability

Scorecards, attribution, alerts

Cost per request, per outcome. LLM unit economics: tie cost to business results.

Cost scorecards

Dashboard: cost per request, per user, per use case. Token breakdown (input vs output). Trend over time.

Attribution

Which model, which prompt template, which cohort drives cost? Attribute to make optimization decisions.

Alerts

Alert on cost spikes, anomalous token usage, budget burn rate. Catch regressions early.

Unit economics

Cost per successful task, cost per ticket resolved. LLM unit economics: tie cost to business outcome.

📈ROI framing

For execs: cost per outcome, not per request

Cost per ticket resolved. Before/after with eval proof. Tradeoff transparency. Budget and forecast.

Cost per outcome

Don't report cost per request. Report cost per ticket resolved, cost per conversion, cost per successful task.

Before/after with eval

Show optimization didn't hurt quality. Eval suite proves it. Exec-ready: 'We cut cost 40% with no quality drop.'

Tradeoff transparency

When you trade quality for cost, say so. Document acceptable tradeoffs. Avoid surprises.

Budget and forecast

Project cost at scale. Model growth, traffic, and unit cost. Help execs plan.

Differentiator

Optimize cost but keep quality—with eval to prove it. No guesswork. Before/after metrics, regression gates, exec-ready narrative.

Need cost optimization with quality proof?

We help teams reduce LLM cost while proving quality holds—with eval suite and before/after metrics.